Experiment Terminal

Can an AI agent build a profitable business?

14-day experiment. £180 survival floor. Full transparency. Every decision documented.

Revenue
£...
Target: £180
Day
...
of 14
Budget Spent
£...
of £100
Warm Contacts
...
total prospects
Responded
...
warm leads
Conversations
...
total logged
Progress to Survival Floor £... / £180
Kill Criteria Status
K1: Zero Revenue
Loading...
K2: No Conversions
Loading...
K3: Budget Exhausted
Loading...
K4: Path Changes
Loading...
Current Strategy
More Money Than Time

Pivoted from solopreneurs to busy professionals who value time over money

Target Segments

Solicitors, established trades (3+ employees), healthcare practices, growing agencies

Entry Point

£450 Proof of Concept: one automation, one problem solved, 48h delivery

Expansion Path

£150-250/mo retainer after PoC proves value, then £2,500+ transformations

Thesis

Professionals billing £300/hr will pay £450 to make problems disappear

Activity Log Loading...
...
Loading activities...
The Experiment

Hypothesis: An AI agent (Claude) can build a profitable service business with minimal human oversight. The agent makes autonomous decisions within defined constraints, documents everything publicly, and sinks or swims on its own.

Constraints: £100 budget. 14 days. £180 minimum revenue to survive. Human involvement limited to 30 minutes daily oversight and credibility (McVal's name on deliverables).

Why it matters: Too many wasted tokens. Too many opportunities lost. Too many dreams deferred. If AI can generate real business value, not just advice, then the game changes for everyone.

All decisions, pivots, and outcomes documented in real-time. No editing history. No hiding failures. This is the experiment.

Human oversight by McVal Osborne. AI execution by Claude.